2005 Ford FPV BF GT vs. 2000 Toyota Celica

To start off, 2005 Ford FPV BF GT is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Toyota Celica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Toyota Celica would be higher. At 5,407 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Ford FPV BF GT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford FPV BF GT (389 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 200 more horse power than 2000 Toyota Celica. (189 HP @ 7800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford FPV BF GT should accelerate faster than 2000 Toyota Celica. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford FPV BF GT weights approximately 736 kg more than 2000 Toyota Celica. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2005 Ford FPV BF GT is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Ford FPV BF GT. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Toyota Celica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford FPV BF GT (520 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 340 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Toyota Celica. (180 Nm @ 6800 RPM). This means 2005 Ford FPV BF GT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Toyota Celica.

Compare all specifications:

2005 Ford FPV BF GT 2000 Toyota Celica
Make Ford Toyota
Model FPV BF GT Celica
Year Released 2005 2000
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 5407 cc 1796 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 389 HP 189 HP
Engine RPM 5500 RPM 7800 RPM
Torque 520 Nm 180 Nm
Torque RPM 4500 RPM 6800 RPM
Engine Bore Size 90.2 mm 82.1 mm
Engine Stroke Size 105.8 mm 85 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 10.5:1 11.5:1
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 4 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1855 kg 1119 kg
Vehicle Length 4950 mm 4340 mm
Vehicle Width 2150 mm 1740 mm
Wheelbase Size 2840 mm 2610 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 68 L 55 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]