2005 Ford FPV BF GT vs. 2003 Smart Roadster
To start off, 2005 Ford FPV BF GT is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Smart Roadster. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Smart Roadster would be higher. At 5,407 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Ford FPV BF GT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford FPV BF GT (389 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 289 more horse power than 2003 Smart Roadster. (100 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford FPV BF GT should accelerate faster than 2003 Smart Roadster.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford FPV BF GT (520 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 390 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Smart Roadster. (130 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2005 Ford FPV BF GT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Smart Roadster.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Ford FPV BF GT | 2003 Smart Roadster | |
Make | Ford | Smart |
Model | FPV BF GT | Roadster |
Year Released | 2005 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 5407 cc | 698 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 389 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 520 Nm | 130 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 9.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4950 mm | 3430 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2150 mm | 1620 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2370 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 35 L |