2005 Ford FPV BF GT vs. 2013 Mini Roadster
To start off, 2013 Mini Roadster is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Ford FPV BF GT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Ford FPV BF GT would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford FPV BF GT weights approximately 660 kg more than 2013 Mini Roadster.
Because 2005 Ford FPV BF GT is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Ford FPV BF GT. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Mini Roadster, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford FPV BF GT (520 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 360 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Mini Roadster. (160 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 2005 Ford FPV BF GT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Mini Roadster.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Ford FPV BF GT | 2013 Mini Roadster | |
| Make | Ford | Mini |
| Model | FPV BF GT | Roadster |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 389 HP | 0 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 520 Nm | 160 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 4250 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 90.2 mm | 77 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 105.8 mm | 85 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1855 kg | 1195 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4950 mm | 3728 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2150 mm | 1892 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2467 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 50 L |
