2005 Ford Freestar vs. 1982 Rolls-Royce Corniche
To start off, 2005 Ford Freestar is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Rolls-Royce Corniche. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Rolls-Royce Corniche would be higher. At 6,748 cc (8 cylinders), 1982 Rolls-Royce Corniche is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Rolls-Royce Corniche weights approximately 340 kg more than 2005 Ford Freestar.
Because 1982 Rolls-Royce Corniche is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Rolls-Royce Corniche. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Ford Freestar, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Ford Freestar | 1982 Rolls-Royce Corniche | |
Make | Ford | Rolls-Royce |
Model | Freestar | Corniche |
Year Released | 2005 | 1982 |
Body Type | Minivan | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3802 cc | 6748 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1940 kg | 2280 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5110 mm | 5210 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1750 mm | 1500 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3070 mm | 3030 mm |