2005 Ford Freestar vs. 1992 Renault Racoon

To start off, 2005 Ford Freestar is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Renault Racoon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Renault Racoon would be higher. At 3,802 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Ford Freestar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford Freestar (190 HP @ 4750 RPM) has 137 more horse power than 1992 Renault Racoon. (53 HP @ 4250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford Freestar should accelerate faster than 1992 Renault Racoon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford Freestar weights approximately 935 kg more than 1992 Renault Racoon. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1992 Renault Racoon is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Ford Freestar. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Renault Racoon will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford Freestar (336 Nm) has 229 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Renault Racoon. (107 Nm). This means 2005 Ford Freestar will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Renault Racoon. 2005 Ford Freestar has automatic transmission and 1992 Renault Racoon has manual transmission. 1992 Renault Racoon will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2005 Ford Freestar will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: