2005 Ford Freestar vs. 2008 Rover 75
To start off, 2008 Rover 75 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Ford Freestar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Ford Freestar would be higher. At 3,900 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Ford Freestar is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford Freestar weights approximately 326 kg more than 2008 Rover 75.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford Freestar (325 Nm) has 85 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Rover 75. (240 Nm). This means 2005 Ford Freestar will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Rover 75.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Ford Freestar | 2008 Rover 75 | |
Make | Ford | Rover |
Model | Freestar | 75 |
Year Released | 2005 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3900 cc | 2497 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 194 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 325 Nm | 240 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 97 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 82.8 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.4:1 | 10.5:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1851 kg | 1525 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5110 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1750 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3070 mm | 2750 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.8 L/100km | 9.9 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 98 L | 65 L |