2005 Ford Freestar vs. 2012 Mercedes-Benz ML

To start off, 2012 Mercedes-Benz ML is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Ford Freestar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Ford Freestar would be higher. At 3,802 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Ford Freestar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Mercedes-Benz ML (302 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 109 more horse power than 2005 Ford Freestar. (193 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Mercedes-Benz ML should accelerate faster than 2005 Ford Freestar.

Because 2012 Mercedes-Benz ML is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Ford Freestar. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Mercedes-Benz ML will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Mercedes-Benz ML (370 Nm) has 45 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Ford Freestar. (325 Nm). This means 2012 Mercedes-Benz ML will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Ford Freestar.

Compare all specifications:

2005 Ford Freestar 2012 Mercedes-Benz ML
Make Ford Mercedes-Benz
Model Freestar ML
Year Released 2005 2012
Body Type Minivan SUV
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3802 cc 3500 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 193 HP 302 HP
Engine RPM 6000 RPM 6500 RPM
Torque 325 Nm 370 Nm
Drive Type Front AWD
Transmission Type Automatic 7-speed shiftable automatic
Number of Seats 7 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Length 5110 mm 4803 mm
Vehicle Width 1950 mm 2141 mm
Vehicle Height 1800 mm 1796 mm
Wheelbase Size 3070 mm 2916 mm
Fuel Consumption 10.2 L/100km 10.7 L/100km
Fuel Consumption City 13.1 L/100km 13.8 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 98 L 93 L