2005 Ford Freestyle vs. 1965 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud
To start off, 2005 Ford Freestyle is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud would be higher. At 6,230 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud weights approximately 304 kg more than 2005 Ford Freestyle.
Because 1965 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Ford Freestyle, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Ford Freestyle | 1965 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud | |
Make | Ford | Rolls-Royce |
Model | Freestyle | Silver Cloud |
Year Released | 2005 | 1965 |
Body Type | Crossover | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2983 cc | 6230 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 210 HP | 0 HP |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 8.9:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1796 kg | 2100 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5080 mm | 5380 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1890 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1680 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 3130 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.2 L/100km | 15.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 81 L |