2005 Ford Freestyle vs. 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom
To start off, 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Ford Freestyle. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Ford Freestyle would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom weights approximately 805 kg more than 2005 Ford Freestyle.
Because 2005 Ford Freestyle is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Ford Freestyle will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom (720 Nm) has 439 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Ford Freestyle. (281 Nm). This means 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Ford Freestyle.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Ford Freestyle | 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom | |
Make | Ford | Rolls-Royce |
Model | Freestyle | Phantom |
Year Released | 2005 | 2013 |
Body Type | Crossover | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 203 HP | 0 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 5350 RPM |
Torque | 281 Nm | 720 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 89 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 79 mm | 84 mm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1865 kg | 2670 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5080 mm | 6092 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1990 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1680 mm | 1640 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 3820 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 9.8 L/100km | 10.3 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 12.4 L/100km | 16.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 100 L |