2005 Ford GT vs. 1960 MG Magnett
To start off, 2005 Ford GT is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 MG Magnett. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 MG Magnett would be higher. At 5,408 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Ford GT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford GT (551 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 488 more horse power than 1960 MG Magnett. (63 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford GT should accelerate faster than 1960 MG Magnett. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford GT weights approximately 444 kg more than 1960 MG Magnett. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford GT (678 Nm) has 563 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 MG Magnett. (115 Nm). This means 2005 Ford GT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 MG Magnett.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Ford GT | 1960 MG Magnett | |
| Make | Ford | MG |
| Model | GT | Magnett |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1960 |
| Engine Size | 5408 cc | 1487 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 551 HP | 63 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6150 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Torque | 678 Nm | 115 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1584 kg | 1140 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4650 mm | 4530 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1620 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1130 mm | 1530 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2530 mm |
