2005 Ford GT vs. 1979 Mazda 626
To start off, 2005 Ford GT is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Mazda 626 would be higher. At 5,407 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Ford GT is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford GT weights approximately 432 kg more than 1979 Mazda 626.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1979 Mazda 626 has automatic transmission and 2005 Ford GT has manual transmission. 2005 Ford GT will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1979 Mazda 626 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Ford GT | 1979 Mazda 626 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | GT | 626 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1979 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5407 cc | 1586 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 493 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1477 kg | 1045 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4650 mm | 4310 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1130 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2520 mm |