2005 Ford GT vs. 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma
To start off, 2005 Ford GT is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma would be higher. At 5,408 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Ford GT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford GT (551 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 462 more horse power than 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma. (89 HP @ 4250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford GT should accelerate faster than 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma.
Because 2005 Ford GT is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Ford GT. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford GT (678 Nm) has 502 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma. (176 Nm). This means 2005 Ford GT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Ford GT | 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma | |
Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
Model | GT | Carisma |
Year Released | 2005 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5408 cc | 1870 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 551 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 6150 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Torque | 678 Nm | 176 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4650 mm | 4440 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1130 mm | 1410 mm |