2005 Ford GT vs. 2013 Lexus RX
To start off, 2013 Lexus RX is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Ford GT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Ford GT would be higher. At 5,408 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Ford GT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford GT (551 HP) has 260 more horse power than 2013 Lexus RX. (291 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford GT should accelerate faster than 2013 Lexus RX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Lexus RX weights approximately 526 kg more than 2005 Ford GT.
Because 2013 Lexus RX is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Ford GT. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Lexus RX will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford GT (678 Nm) has 361 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Lexus RX. (317 Nm). This means 2005 Ford GT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Lexus RX.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Ford GT | 2013 Lexus RX | |
Make | Ford | Lexus |
Model | GT | RX |
Year Released | 2005 | 2013 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5408 cc | 211 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | electric |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 551 HP | 291 HP |
Torque | 678 Nm | 317 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 90 mm | 94 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 106 mm | 83 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.4:1 | 12.5:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1584 kg | 2110 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4650 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1885 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1130 mm | 1720 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2740 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 11.2 L/100km | 7.2 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 18.1 L/100km | 6.7 L/100km |