2005 Ford Ikon vs. 1949 Hudson Commodore
To start off, 2005 Ford Ikon is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Hudson Commodore. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Hudson Commodore would be higher. At 4,166 cc (8 cylinders), 1949 Hudson Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1949 Hudson Commodore (128 HP) has 54 more horse power than 2005 Ford Ikon. (74 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1949 Hudson Commodore should accelerate faster than 2005 Ford Ikon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1949 Hudson Commodore weights approximately 613 kg more than 2005 Ford Ikon. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1949 Hudson Commodore is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1949 Hudson Commodore. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Ford Ikon, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Ford Ikon | 1949 Hudson Commodore | |
Make | Ford | Hudson |
Model | Ikon | Commodore |
Year Released | 2005 | 1949 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1297 cc | 4166 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 128 HP |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.2:1 | 6.5:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1043 kg | 1656 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 3160 mm |