2005 Ford Ikon vs. 1964 Triumph 2000
To start off, 2005 Ford Ikon is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Triumph 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford Ikon (94 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 1964 Triumph 2000. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford Ikon should accelerate faster than 1964 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Triumph 2000 weights approximately 110 kg more than 2005 Ford Ikon.
Let's talk about torque, 1964 Triumph 2000 (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 21 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Ford Ikon. (137 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1964 Triumph 2000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Ford Ikon.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Ford Ikon | 1964 Triumph 2000 | |
| Make | Ford | Triumph |
| Model | Ikon | 2000 |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1594 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 94 HP | 89 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 137 Nm | 158 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 82 mm | 74.7 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 75.5 mm | 76 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 9.3:1 |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1060 kg | 1170 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2700 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 48 L | 64 L |
