2005 Ford Ikon vs. 1982 Lancia Gamma
To start off, 2005 Ford Ikon is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Lancia Gamma. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Lancia Gamma would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Lancia Gamma is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Lancia Gamma (116 HP) has 42 more horse power than 2005 Ford Ikon. (74 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1982 Lancia Gamma should accelerate faster than 2005 Ford Ikon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Lancia Gamma weights approximately 277 kg more than 2005 Ford Ikon. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Lancia Gamma (175 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 65 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Ford Ikon. (110 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1982 Lancia Gamma will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Ford Ikon. 1982 Lancia Gamma has automatic transmission and 2005 Ford Ikon has manual transmission. 2005 Ford Ikon will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1982 Lancia Gamma will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Ford Ikon | 1982 Lancia Gamma | |
| Make | Ford | Lancia |
| Model | Ikon | Gamma |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1297 cc | 1999 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 74 HP | 116 HP |
| Torque | 110 Nm | 175 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.2:1 | 8.9:1 |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1043 kg | 1320 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2680 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 48 L | 59 L |
