2005 Ford Ikon vs. 1996 Mazda RX-01
To start off, 2005 Ford Ikon is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mazda RX-01. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mazda RX-01 would be higher. At 2,615 cc, 1996 Mazda RX-01 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Mazda RX-01 (217 HP @ 8500 RPM) has 123 more horse power than 2005 Ford Ikon. (94 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Mazda RX-01 should accelerate faster than 2005 Ford Ikon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Mazda RX-01 weights approximately 57 kg more than 2005 Ford Ikon. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Mazda RX-01 (220 Nm @ 6000 RPM) has 85 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Ford Ikon. (135 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1996 Mazda RX-01 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Ford Ikon.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Ford Ikon | 1996 Mazda RX-01 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Ikon | RX-01 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1595 cc | 2615 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 94 HP | 217 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 8500 RPM |
Torque | 135 Nm | 220 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 9.0:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1043 kg | 1100 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2350 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 55 L |