2005 Ford Ka vs. 1966 Jaguar E-Type

To start off, 2005 Ford Ka is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Jaguar E-Type. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Jaguar E-Type would be higher. At 4,235 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Jaguar E-Type is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Jaguar E-Type (265 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 192 more horse power than 2005 Ford Ka. (73 HP @ 6150 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1966 Jaguar E-Type should accelerate faster than 2005 Ford Ka. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Jaguar E-Type weights approximately 375 kg more than 2005 Ford Ka. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1966 Jaguar E-Type is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Jaguar E-Type. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Ford Ka, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1966 Jaguar E-Type (385 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 275 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Ford Ka. (110 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1966 Jaguar E-Type will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Ford Ka.

Compare all specifications:

2005 Ford Ka 1966 Jaguar E-Type
Make Ford Jaguar
Model Ka E-Type
Year Released 2005 1966
Body Type Hatchback Coupe
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1294 cc 4235 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 73 HP 265 HP
Engine RPM 6150 RPM 5400 RPM
Torque 110 Nm 385 Nm
Torque RPM 3000 RPM 4000 RPM
Engine Bore Size 74.1 mm 92.1 mm
Engine Stroke Size 75.5 mm 106 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 10.0:1 9.0:1
Drive Type Front Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 4 seats 4 seats
Number of Doors 3 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 870 kg 1245 kg
Vehicle Length 3630 mm 4690 mm
Vehicle Width 1640 mm 1660 mm
Vehicle Height 1420 mm 1280 mm
Wheelbase Size 2620 mm 2670 mm
Fuel Consumption Overall 11.8 L/100km 11.6 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 42 L 63 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]