2005 Ford Ka vs. 1970 NSU 1200
To start off, 2005 Ford Ka is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 NSU 1200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 NSU 1200 would be higher. At 1,294 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Ford Ka is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1970 NSU 1200 (85 HP) has 12 more horse power than 2005 Ford Ka. (73 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1970 NSU 1200 should accelerate faster than 2005 Ford Ka.
Because 1970 NSU 1200 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1970 NSU 1200. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Ford Ka, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford Ka (110 Nm) has 29 more torque (in Nm) than 1970 NSU 1200. (81 Nm). This means 2005 Ford Ka will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1970 NSU 1200.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Ford Ka | 1970 NSU 1200 | |
Make | Ford | NSU |
Model | Ka | 1200 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1970 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1294 cc | 996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 73 HP | 85 HP |
Torque | 110 Nm | 81 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 74.1 mm | 69.2 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 75.5 mm | 66.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 10.5:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3630 mm | 3820 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2240 mm |