2005 Ford Ka vs. 1976 Mazda 929
To start off, 2005 Ford Ka is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Mazda 929. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Mazda 929 would be higher. At 1,769 cc (4 cylinders), 1976 Mazda 929 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford Ka (94 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 11 more horse power than 1976 Mazda 929. (83 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford Ka should accelerate faster than 1976 Mazda 929. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford Ka weights approximately 14 kg more than 1976 Mazda 929. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1976 Mazda 929 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1976 Mazda 929. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Ford Ka, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1976 Mazda 929 (137 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 2 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Ford Ka. (135 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 1976 Mazda 929 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Ford Ka.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Ford Ka | 1976 Mazda 929 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Ka | 929 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1976 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1599 cc | 1769 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 94 HP | 83 HP |
Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 135 Nm | 137 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4250 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 82.1 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 75.5 mm | 88 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 8.6:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1136 kg | 1122 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3660 mm | 4550 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2520 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 65 L |