2005 Ford Ka vs. 2002 Jaguar S-Type
To start off, 2005 Ford Ka is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Jaguar S-Type. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Jaguar S-Type would be higher. At 4,235 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Jaguar S-Type is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Jaguar S-Type (400 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 306 more horse power than 2005 Ford Ka. (94 HP @ 5300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Jaguar S-Type should accelerate faster than 2005 Ford Ka. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Jaguar S-Type weights approximately 664 kg more than 2005 Ford Ka. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2002 Jaguar S-Type is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Jaguar S-Type. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Ford Ka, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Jaguar S-Type (541 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 406 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Ford Ka. (135 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 2002 Jaguar S-Type will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Ford Ka. 2002 Jaguar S-Type has automatic transmission and 2005 Ford Ka has manual transmission. 2005 Ford Ka will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Jaguar S-Type will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Ford Ka | 2002 Jaguar S-Type | |
| Make | Ford | Jaguar |
| Model | Ka | S-Type |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2002 |
| Body Type | Roadster | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1599 cc | 4235 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 94 HP | 400 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 6100 RPM |
| Torque | 135 Nm | 541 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4250 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 82.1 mm | 86 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 75.5 mm | 90.3 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 9.1:1 |
| Top Speed | 173 km/hour | 250 km/hour |
| Acceleration 0-100mph | 12.1 seconds | 5.6 seconds |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1136 kg | 1800 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3660 mm | 4880 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2920 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 69 L |
