2005 Ford Ka vs. 2003 Renault Clio
To start off, 2005 Ford Ka is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Renault Clio would be higher. At 1,599 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Ford Ka is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Renault Clio (97 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 2005 Ford Ka. (94 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 2005 Ford Ka. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford Ka weights approximately 19 kg more than 2003 Renault Clio.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford Ka (135 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 8 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Renault Clio. (127 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 2005 Ford Ka will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Ford Ka | 2003 Renault Clio | |
Make | Ford | Renault |
Model | Ka | Clio |
Year Released | 2005 | 2003 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1599 cc | 1390 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 94 HP | 97 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 135 Nm | 127 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4250 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 82.1 mm | 79.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 75.5 mm | 70 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
Top Speed | 174 km/hour | 185 km/hour |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 10 seconds | 10.5 seconds |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1019 kg | 1000 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3660 mm | 3820 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2590 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 7.6 L/100km | 6.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 50 L |