2005 Ford Lynx vs. 1993 Jaguar XJ
To start off, 2005 Ford Lynx is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Jaguar XJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Jaguar XJ would be higher. At 5,993 cc (12 cylinders), 1993 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1993 Jaguar XJ (318 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 210 more horse power than 2005 Ford Lynx. (108 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1993 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 2005 Ford Lynx.
Because 1993 Jaguar XJ is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1993 Jaguar XJ. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Ford Lynx, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1993 Jaguar XJ (464 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 319 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Ford Lynx. (145 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1993 Jaguar XJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Ford Lynx.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Ford Lynx | 1993 Jaguar XJ | |
| Make | Ford | Jaguar |
| Model | Lynx | XJ |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1993 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1595 cc | 5993 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 108 HP | 318 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Torque | 145 Nm | 464 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3750 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4990 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1800 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1110 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2880 mm |
