2005 Ford Maverick vs. 1952 Jaguar XK
To start off, 2005 Ford Maverick is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 3,441 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Jaguar XK (158 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 44 more horse power than 2005 Ford Maverick. (114 HP @ 6250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1952 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 2005 Ford Maverick. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford Maverick weights approximately 220 kg more than 1952 Jaguar XK.
Because 2005 Ford Maverick is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Jaguar XK. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Ford Maverick will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1952 Jaguar XK (290 Nm) has 130 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Ford Maverick. (160 Nm). This means 1952 Jaguar XK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Ford Maverick.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Ford Maverick | 1952 Jaguar XK | |
| Make | Ford | Jaguar |
| Model | Maverick | XK |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1952 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2699 cc | 3441 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 114 HP | 158 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 160 Nm | 290 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1515 kg | 1295 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2600 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 63 L |
