2005 Ford Maverick vs. 1981 Mercury Lynx
To start off, 2005 Ford Maverick is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Mercury Lynx. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Mercury Lynx would be higher. At 2,699 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Ford Maverick is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford Maverick (114 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 44 more horse power than 1981 Mercury Lynx. (70 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford Maverick should accelerate faster than 1981 Mercury Lynx. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford Maverick weights approximately 565 kg more than 1981 Mercury Lynx. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Ford Maverick is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1981 Mercury Lynx. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Ford Maverick will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford Maverick (160 Nm) has 39 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Mercury Lynx. (121 Nm). This means 2005 Ford Maverick will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Mercury Lynx.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Ford Maverick | 1981 Mercury Lynx | |
Make | Ford | Mercury |
Model | Maverick | Lynx |
Year Released | 2005 | 1981 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2699 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 70 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 160 Nm | 121 Nm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1515 kg | 950 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2400 mm |