2005 Ford Maverick vs. 2000 GMC Yukon
To start off, 2005 Ford Maverick is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 GMC Yukon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 GMC Yukon would be higher. At 5,326 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 GMC Yukon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 GMC Yukon (269 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 155 more horse power than 2005 Ford Maverick. (114 HP @ 6250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 GMC Yukon should accelerate faster than 2005 Ford Maverick. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 GMC Yukon weights approximately 775 kg more than 2005 Ford Maverick. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 GMC Yukon (451 Nm) has 291 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Ford Maverick. (160 Nm). This means 2000 GMC Yukon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Ford Maverick.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Ford Maverick | 2000 GMC Yukon | |
Make | Ford | GMC |
Model | Maverick | Yukon |
Year Released | 2005 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2699 cc | 5326 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 269 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 160 Nm | 451 Nm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1515 kg | 2290 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2950 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 140 L |