2005 Ford Maverick vs. 2000 Mitsubishi SSU
To start off, 2005 Ford Maverick is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Mitsubishi SSU. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Mitsubishi SSU would be higher. At 2,699 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Ford Maverick is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Mitsubishi SSU (119 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 2005 Ford Maverick. (114 HP @ 6250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Mitsubishi SSU should accelerate faster than 2005 Ford Maverick. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Mitsubishi SSU weights approximately 390 kg more than 2005 Ford Maverick. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Mitsubishi SSU (240 Nm) has 80 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Ford Maverick. (160 Nm). This means 2000 Mitsubishi SSU will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Ford Maverick.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Ford Maverick | 2000 Mitsubishi SSU | |
Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
Model | Maverick | SSU |
Year Released | 2005 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2699 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 119 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 160 Nm | 240 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1515 kg | 1905 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2570 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 71 L |