2005 Ford Maverick vs. 2000 Opel Omega

To start off, 2005 Ford Maverick is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Opel Omega. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Opel Omega would be higher. At 3,175 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Opel Omega is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Opel Omega (218 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 104 more horse power than 2005 Ford Maverick. (114 HP @ 6250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Opel Omega should accelerate faster than 2005 Ford Maverick. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Opel Omega weights approximately 195 kg more than 2005 Ford Maverick. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2005 Ford Maverick is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Opel Omega. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Ford Maverick will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Opel Omega (290 Nm) has 130 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Ford Maverick. (160 Nm). This means 2000 Opel Omega will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Ford Maverick.

Compare all specifications: