2005 Ford Maverick vs. 2013 Volvo S60
To start off, 2013 Volvo S60 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Ford Maverick. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Ford Maverick would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Volvo S60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Volvo S60 (321 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 207 more horse power than 2005 Ford Maverick. (114 HP @ 6250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Volvo S60 should accelerate faster than 2005 Ford Maverick. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Volvo S60 weights approximately 247 kg more than 2005 Ford Maverick. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Volvo S60 (480 Nm) has 320 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Ford Maverick. (160 Nm). This means 2013 Volvo S60 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Ford Maverick.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Ford Maverick | 2013 Volvo S60 | |
| Make | Ford | Volvo |
| Model | Maverick | S60 |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2699 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | W |
| Horse Power | 114 HP | 321 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Torque | 160 Nm | 480 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | CVT |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1515 kg | 1762 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2776 mm |
