2005 Ford Mondeo vs. 1960 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud
To start off, 2005 Ford Mondeo is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud would be higher. At 6,230 cc (8 cylinders), 1960 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud weights approximately 634 kg more than 2005 Ford Mondeo.
Because 1960 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Ford Mondeo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Ford Mondeo | 1960 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud | |
| Make | Ford | Rolls-Royce |
| Model | Mondeo | Silver Cloud |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1960 |
| Body Type | Station Wagon | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2198 cc | 6230 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 154 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1478 kg | 2112 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 5490 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1910 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1630 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 3070 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 6.1 L/100km | 15.2 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 58 L | 81 L |
