2005 Ford Mondeo vs. 1962 Volvo 220
To start off, 2005 Ford Mondeo is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Volvo 220. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Volvo 220 would be higher. At 1,778 cc (4 cylinders), 1962 Volvo 220 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford Mondeo (128 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 54 more horse power than 1962 Volvo 220. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford Mondeo should accelerate faster than 1962 Volvo 220. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford Mondeo weights approximately 419 kg more than 1962 Volvo 220. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford Mondeo (170 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 26 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Volvo 220. (144 Nm @ 2300 RPM). This means 2005 Ford Mondeo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Volvo 220.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Ford Mondeo | 1962 Volvo 220 | |
Make | Ford | Volvo |
Model | Mondeo | 220 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1753 cc | 1778 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 128 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 170 Nm | 144 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 2300 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1434 kg | 1015 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 45 L |