2005 Ford Mondeo vs. 1963 Riley Elf
To start off, 2005 Ford Mondeo is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Riley Elf. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Riley Elf would be higher. At 2,983 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Ford Mondeo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford Mondeo (223 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 189 more horse power than 1963 Riley Elf. (34 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford Mondeo should accelerate faster than 1963 Riley Elf. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford Mondeo weights approximately 845 kg more than 1963 Riley Elf. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford Mondeo (281 Nm @ 4900 RPM) has 221 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Riley Elf. (60 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 2005 Ford Mondeo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Riley Elf.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Ford Mondeo | 1963 Riley Elf | |
| Make | Ford | Riley |
| Model | Mondeo | Elf |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2983 cc | 847 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 223 HP | 34 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6150 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 281 Nm | 60 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4900 RPM | 2900 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 8.3:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Top Speed | 250 km/hour | 122 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1495 kg | 650 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 3280 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1420 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1350 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2040 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 25 L |
