2005 Ford Mondeo vs. 1978 Toyota Celica

To start off, 2005 Ford Mondeo is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Toyota Celica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Toyota Celica would be higher. At 1,753 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Ford Mondeo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford Mondeo (132 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 46 more horse power than 1978 Toyota Celica. (86 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford Mondeo should accelerate faster than 1978 Toyota Celica. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford Mondeo weights approximately 400 kg more than 1978 Toyota Celica. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1978 Toyota Celica is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1978 Toyota Celica. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Ford Mondeo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford Mondeo (174 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 56 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Toyota Celica. (118 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2005 Ford Mondeo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Toyota Celica.

Compare all specifications:

2005 Ford Mondeo 1978 Toyota Celica
Make Ford Toyota
Model Mondeo Celica
Year Released 2005 1978
Body Type Station Wagon Coupe
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1753 cc 1586 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 132 HP 86 HP
Engine RPM 6000 RPM 5600 RPM
Torque 174 Nm 118 Nm
Torque RPM 4250 RPM 4000 RPM
Engine Bore Size 83 mm 85 mm
Engine Stroke Size 83.1 mm 70 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 11.0:1 9.4:1
Drive Type Front Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 4 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1395 kg 995 kg
Vehicle Length 4740 mm 4340 mm
Vehicle Width 1820 mm 1640 mm
Vehicle Height 1420 mm 1330 mm
Wheelbase Size 2760 mm 2510 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 59 L 60 L