2005 Ford Mondeo vs. 1981 Zastava 1500
To start off, 2005 Ford Mondeo is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Zastava 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Zastava 1500 would be higher. At 2,262 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Ford Mondeo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford Mondeo (149 HP @ 3500 RPM) has 75 more horse power than 1981 Zastava 1500. (74 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford Mondeo should accelerate faster than 1981 Zastava 1500.
Because 1981 Zastava 1500 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1981 Zastava 1500. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Ford Mondeo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford Mondeo (374 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 261 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Zastava 1500. (113 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2005 Ford Mondeo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Zastava 1500.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Ford Mondeo | 1981 Zastava 1500 | |
Make | Ford | Zastava |
Model | Mondeo | 1500 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1981 |
Engine Size | 2262 cc | 1480 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 149 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 374 Nm | 113 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 4040 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2430 mm |