2005 Ford Mustang vs. 1948 Studebaker Commander
To start off, 2005 Ford Mustang is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Studebaker Commander. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Studebaker Commander would be higher. At 4,015 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford Mustang (202 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 108 more horse power than 1948 Studebaker Commander. (94 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1948 Studebaker Commander. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford Mustang weights approximately 39 kg more than 1948 Studebaker Commander. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Ford Mustang | 1948 Studebaker Commander | |
Make | Ford | Studebaker |
Model | Mustang | Commander |
Year Released | 2005 | 1948 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4015 cc | 3703 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 202 HP | 94 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 100 mm | 84.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 111.1 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1497 kg | 1458 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 5200 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 3030 mm |