2005 Ford Mustang vs. 1948 Volvo PV 60
To start off, 2005 Ford Mustang is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Volvo PV 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Volvo PV 60 would be higher. At 4,015 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford Mustang (202 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 117 more horse power than 1948 Volvo PV 60. (85 HP @ 3400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1948 Volvo PV 60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1948 Volvo PV 60 weights approximately 133 kg more than 2005 Ford Mustang.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Ford Mustang | 1948 Volvo PV 60 | |
| Make | Ford | Volvo |
| Model | Mustang | PV 60 |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1948 |
| Engine Size | 4015 cc | 3670 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 202 HP | 85 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 3400 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1497 kg | 1630 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2850 mm |
