2005 Ford Mustang vs. 1951 Humber Pullman
To start off, 2005 Ford Mustang is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Humber Pullman. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Humber Pullman would be higher. At 4,085 cc (6 cylinders), 1951 Humber Pullman is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford Mustang (202 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 102 more horse power than 1951 Humber Pullman. (100 HP @ 3400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1951 Humber Pullman. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 Humber Pullman weights approximately 535 kg more than 2005 Ford Mustang.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Ford Mustang | 1951 Humber Pullman | |
| Make | Ford | Humber |
| Model | Mustang | Pullman |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1951 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4015 cc | 4085 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 202 HP | 100 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 3400 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 100 mm | 85 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 120 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 8 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1497 kg | 2032 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 5390 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1910 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 3330 mm |
