2005 Ford Mustang vs. 1953 Isuzu Minx
To start off, 2005 Ford Mustang is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Isuzu Minx. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Isuzu Minx would be higher. At 4,015 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford Mustang (202 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 165 more horse power than 1953 Isuzu Minx. (37 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1953 Isuzu Minx. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford Mustang weights approximately 537 kg more than 1953 Isuzu Minx. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Ford Mustang | 1953 Isuzu Minx | |
| Make | Ford | Isuzu |
| Model | Mustang | Minx |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1953 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4015 cc | 1265 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 202 HP | 37 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1497 kg | 960 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4070 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1580 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1530 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2370 mm |
