2005 Ford Mustang vs. 1960 Triumph Herald
To start off, 2005 Ford Mustang is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Triumph Herald. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Triumph Herald would be higher. At 4,015 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford Mustang (202 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 164 more horse power than 1960 Triumph Herald. (38 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1960 Triumph Herald. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford Mustang weights approximately 737 kg more than 1960 Triumph Herald. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford Mustang (326 Nm) has 243 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Triumph Herald. (83 Nm). This means 2005 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Triumph Herald.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Ford Mustang | 1960 Triumph Herald | |
Make | Ford | Triumph |
Model | Mustang | Herald |
Year Released | 2005 | 1960 |
Body Type | Coupe | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4015 cc | 1147 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 202 HP | 38 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 326 Nm | 83 Nm |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1497 kg | 760 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 3870 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1530 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2320 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 29 L |