2005 Ford Mustang vs. 1966 Seat 600

To start off, 2005 Ford Mustang is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Seat 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Seat 600 would be higher. At 4,015 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford Mustang (202 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 178 more horse power than 1966 Seat 600. (24 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1966 Seat 600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford Mustang weights approximately 922 kg more than 1966 Seat 600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford Mustang (326 Nm) has 279 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Seat 600. (47 Nm). This means 2005 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Seat 600.

Compare all specifications:

2005 Ford Mustang 1966 Seat 600
Make Ford Seat
Model Mustang 600
Year Released 2005 1966
Engine Position Front Rear
Engine Size 4015 cc 765 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 202 HP 24 HP
Engine RPM 6000 RPM 4600 RPM
Torque 326 Nm 47 Nm
Drive Type Rear Rear
Vehicle Weight 1497 kg 575 kg
Vehicle Length 4770 mm 3300 mm
Vehicle Width 1890 mm 1390 mm
Vehicle Height 1390 mm 1360 mm
Wheelbase Size 2620 mm 2010 mm