2005 Ford Mustang vs. 1968 Suzuki Fronte
To start off, 2005 Ford Mustang is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 4,015 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford Mustang (202 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 182 more horse power than 1968 Suzuki Fronte. (20 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1968 Suzuki Fronte. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford Mustang weights approximately 1071 kg more than 1968 Suzuki Fronte. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford Mustang (326 Nm) has 289 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Suzuki Fronte. (37 Nm). This means 2005 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Suzuki Fronte.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Ford Mustang | 1968 Suzuki Fronte | |
Make | Ford | Suzuki |
Model | Mustang | Fronte |
Year Released | 2005 | 1968 |
Engine Size | 4015 cc | 356 cc |
Horse Power | 202 HP | 20 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 326 Nm | 37 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1497 kg | 426 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 3000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1300 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 1970 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.7 L/100km | 7.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 66 L |