2005 Ford Mustang vs. 1970 Triumph 2000
To start off, 2005 Ford Mustang is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 4,603 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford Mustang (300 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 178 more horse power than 1970 Triumph 2000. (122 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1970 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford Mustang weights approximately 295 kg more than 1970 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford Mustang (434 Nm) has 227 more torque (in Nm) than 1970 Triumph 2000. (207 Nm). This means 2005 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1970 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Ford Mustang | 1970 Triumph 2000 | |
| Make | Ford | Triumph |
| Model | Mustang | 2000 |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1970 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4603 cc | 2497 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 300 HP | 122 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 434 Nm | 207 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 90 mm | 74.7 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 95 mm |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1565 kg | 1270 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4510 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2700 mm |
