2005 Ford Mustang vs. 1972 ZIL 114
To start off, 2005 Ford Mustang is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 ZIL 114. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 ZIL 114 would be higher. At 6,959 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 ZIL 114 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 ZIL 114 (296 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 94 more horse power than 2005 Ford Mustang. (202 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1972 ZIL 114 should accelerate faster than 2005 Ford Mustang. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 ZIL 114 weights approximately 1678 kg more than 2005 Ford Mustang. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1972 ZIL 114 (580 Nm) has 254 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Ford Mustang. (326 Nm). This means 1972 ZIL 114 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Ford Mustang.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Ford Mustang | 1972 ZIL 114 | |
| Make | Ford | ZIL |
| Model | Mustang | 114 |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1972 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4015 cc | 6959 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 202 HP | 296 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Torque | 326 Nm | 580 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1497 kg | 3175 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 6300 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 2080 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1520 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 3770 mm |
