2005 Ford Mustang vs. 1974 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 2005 Ford Mustang is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 4,015 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford Mustang (202 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 84 more horse power than 1974 Nissan Cedric. (118 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1974 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford Mustang weights approximately 177 kg more than 1974 Nissan Cedric. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford Mustang (326 Nm) has 110 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Nissan Cedric. (216 Nm). This means 2005 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Ford Mustang | 1974 Nissan Cedric | |
| Make | Ford | Nissan |
| Model | Mustang | Cedric |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1974 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4015 cc | 2563 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 202 HP | 118 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 326 Nm | 216 Nm |
| Vehicle Weight | 1497 kg | 1320 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4700 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2700 mm |
