2005 Ford Mustang vs. 1975 Rolls-Royce Camargue
To start off, 2005 Ford Mustang is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Rolls-Royce Camargue. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Rolls-Royce Camargue would be higher. At 6,750 cc (8 cylinders), 1975 Rolls-Royce Camargue is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1975 Rolls-Royce Camargue weights approximately 858 kg more than 2005 Ford Mustang.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Ford Mustang | 1975 Rolls-Royce Camargue | |
| Make | Ford | Rolls-Royce |
| Model | Mustang | Camargue |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1975 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4015 cc | 6750 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 202 HP | 0 HP |
| Engine Bore Size | 100 mm | 104.1 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 99.1 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1497 kg | 2355 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 5180 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1930 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1480 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 3050 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 107 L |
