2005 Ford Mustang vs. 1979 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 2005 Ford Mustang is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 4,015 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford Mustang weights approximately 15 kg more than 1979 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Ford Mustang | 1979 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | Ford | Oldsmobile |
Model | Mustang | Cutlass |
Year Released | 2005 | 1979 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4015 cc | 3790 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 202 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1497 kg | 1482 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 5530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2760 mm |