2005 Ford Mustang vs. 1979 Toyota Celica
To start off, 2005 Ford Mustang is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Toyota Celica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Toyota Celica would be higher. At 4,603 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford Mustang (300 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 182 more horse power than 1979 Toyota Celica. (118 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1979 Toyota Celica. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford Mustang weights approximately 385 kg more than 1979 Toyota Celica. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford Mustang (434 Nm) has 219 more torque (in Nm) than 1979 Toyota Celica. (215 Nm). This means 2005 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1979 Toyota Celica.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Ford Mustang | 1979 Toyota Celica | |
Make | Ford | Toyota |
Model | Mustang | Celica |
Year Released | 2005 | 1979 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4603 cc | 2563 cc |
Horse Power | 300 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 434 Nm | 215 Nm |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1565 kg | 1180 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1320 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2640 mm |