2005 Ford Mustang vs. 1979 Zastava 132
To start off, 2005 Ford Mustang is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Zastava 132. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Zastava 132 would be higher. At 4,015 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford Mustang (202 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 96 more horse power than 1979 Zastava 132. (106 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1979 Zastava 132. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford Mustang weights approximately 402 kg more than 1979 Zastava 132. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford Mustang (326 Nm) has 184 more torque (in Nm) than 1979 Zastava 132. (142 Nm). This means 2005 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1979 Zastava 132.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Ford Mustang | 1979 Zastava 132 | |
| Make | Ford | Zastava |
| Model | Mustang | 132 |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1979 |
| Engine Size | 4015 cc | 1754 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 202 HP | 106 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 326 Nm | 142 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1497 kg | 1095 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4410 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1650 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2560 mm |
