2005 Ford Mustang vs. 1980 Volvo 66
To start off, 2005 Ford Mustang is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Volvo 66. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Volvo 66 would be higher. At 4,009 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford Mustang (210 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 163 more horse power than 1980 Volvo 66. (47 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1980 Volvo 66. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford Mustang weights approximately 565 kg more than 1980 Volvo 66. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Ford Mustang | 1980 Volvo 66 | |
| Make | Ford | Volvo |
| Model | Mustang | 66 |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1980 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4009 cc | 1108 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 210 HP | 47 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1387 kg | 822 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 3910 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1390 mm |
