2005 Ford Mustang vs. 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 2005 Ford Mustang is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 4,015 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford Mustang weights approximately 171 kg more than 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Because 2005 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Ford Mustang | 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | Ford | Oldsmobile |
Model | Mustang | Cutlass |
Year Released | 2005 | 1981 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4015 cc | 2568 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 202 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1497 kg | 1326 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4850 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2680 mm |